Jury Trial
Deadline for Filing of Perpetuation Depositions (Three Working Days Prior to Trial) (DPD)
Defendant(s) Deadline for Taking Perpetuation Depositions (DDPD)
This document means that both sides in the case have come to an agreement to settle things and want the case to be officially closed. Because they settled, the case will be dismissed for good, and neither side will have to pay the other for costs related to the case. The court has agreed to this dismissal.
Final Pretrial Conference
Deadline for Motion in Limine and Proposed Jury Instructions
Deadline for Filing Joint Pretrial Statement (JPTS)
Plaintiff(s) Deadline for Taking Perpetuation Depositions (PDPD)
Deadline for Objections to Trial Materials (DOTM)
Deadline for Trial Materials Exchange (DTME)
Deadline for Filing Daubert Challenges (Ten Working Days Prior to Final Pretrial Conference) (DC)
Completion of All Discovery (COD)
Deadline for the parties to file their own dismissal entry after settlement.
Filing Deadline for Motions for Summary Judgment (SJ)
This is a notice from the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court saying that since both sides have come to an agreement and settled the case, the court is officially closing the case. They are doing this without any penalties or consequences for either side, meaning they can still come back to the court if there are any issues with the settlement in the future.
This notice tells everyone involved in the case that the parties have agreed to settle their dispute during mediation. They have two weeks from now to officially close the case by submitting a dismissal request. If they don’t do that, the court will automatically drop the case, but it will still have the power to enforce the terms of the settlement if needed.
The court has officially approved a payment to Peter Von Meister for his mediation services from a meeting that took place on August 26, 2015, in the case involving Jamie Smith and others against Margaret Zemany. The order states how much money will be paid and includes important details about the mediation session.
Mediation session conducted
A mediation was held and the parties entered into a settlement agreement.
Filing Deadline for Motions to Add a Necessary Party (E.G. Subrogated Insurers, Etc.)
Defendant(s) Disclosure of Experts (DDE)
Plaintiff(s) Disclosure of Experts (PDE)
The Plaintiff's lawyer has let the court know that they have given the answers to the questions asked by the Defendants, along with the requested documents, to the Defendants' lawyer.
This document outlines the plan for a phone meeting and an in-person meeting to help the parties resolve their case. It names Peter von Meister as the person who will help mediate the discussions. It also includes important dates for when certain papers need to be submitted and explains who needs to be present during these meetings.
Mediation telephone scheduling conference for attorneys.
This document, filed by Jamie Smith for the plaintiff, is a list of expert witnesses who might testify during the trial. It includes names like Dr. Jonathan Paley and Dr. Ted Murdock. Jamie's attorney submitted this document and ensured that everyone involved in the case has been notified about it electronically.
This is a court order that says the case will go to mediation, which is a way to resolve the dispute outside of court. Peter von Meister has been chosen to help with mediation. There will also be a phone meeting scheduled for June 9, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. where everyone involved will discuss the mediation process and how to proceed. Both the parties and their lawyers must take part in this mediation and follow the guidelines provided.
This is a Final Pretrial Order from the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court. It outlines important dates and deadlines for our case, such as when we need to share evidence (discovery), submit motions (requests to the court), and prepare documents for the trial. It also sets the date for our last meeting before the trial and when the actual trial will happen. Additionally, it explains what our lawyer needs to do to get ready for the trial.
Telephone pretrial scheduling conference
Failure to file a response to the notice may result in administrative dismissal of the action.
The court has set up a phone meeting for the lawyers involved in the case of Jamie Smith and others against Margaret Zemany. This meeting will take place on May 22, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. The lawyers need to be ready to discuss important topics like evidence sharing, any legal requests, and possible agreements to resolve the case before going to trial. They should also make sure to talk to each other about these issues before the meeting.
This document is a response from Margaret Zemany, who is representing the Defendant, to the accusations made against them in a legal complaint. In this response, they deny the claims made in the complaint and raise several legal reasons why the case should not continue. These reasons include arguments that the lawsuit is flawed or unfair in various ways. Margaret is asking the court to dismiss the case permanently and is also demanding that a jury trial be held to decide the matter.
Filing of response to complaint by defendant.
This document is a formal notice that lawyer Jonathan G. Preston is officially representing the Defendant, Margaret Zemany, in the case. It requests that any future legal documents or communications related to the case be sent to him instead of to Margaret. It also confirms that the opposing lawyer has been informed about this change.
This is a notification from the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court letting everyone know that the defendant, Margaret Zemany, has not responded to the case or shown up in court. The document suggests that the plaintiff should check the case file and move forward with asking for a default judgment if it's the right step, or tell the court if there’s a good reason to hold off. If no one responds within fourteen days, the case could be thrown out.
Original Answer must be filed with the Clerk of Court's Office within 3 days after serving the Plaintiff's attorney or Plaintiff.
Defendant must serve an Answer to the Complaint within 28 days after receipt of the summons.
This document is a summons from the Montgomery County Court, telling the defendant, Margaret Zemany, that a complaint has been made against her. It informs her that she needs to respond to this complaint within a certain time frame. The summons also has instructions on how to file her response and explains the process for serving this document.
Jamie Smith and Jessica Smith have filed a legal document against Margaret Zemany because they were hurt in a car accident. They claim that Margaret was careless, which caused them physical injuries and emotional distress, as well as medical bills and loss of companionship. They are asking for more than $25,000 in compensation, along with interest and court costs, and they want a jury to hear their case.
Jamie Smith has filed a legal document called a "Complaint for Personal Injury" in the Montgomery County Court. This complaint is against Margaret Zemany. The document also contains details on how to send this complaint to Margaret using certified mail, which is a secure way to ensure she receives it.
This is a document created by the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court that provides important information about a civil lawsuit. It includes the names of the people involved, their lawyers, and some key details about the case related to a personal injury.