This is the Answer of Defendant Margaret Zemany to the Complaint, denying the allegations and asserting affirmative defenses including set-off, failure to join necessary parties, failure to state a claim, comparative negligence, statute of limitations, and other defenses. The Defendant requests dismissal with prejudice and demands a jury trial.
Filing Date
Monday, April 27, 2015
Client Summary
This document is a response from Margaret Zemany, who is representing the Defendant, to the accusations made against them in a legal complaint. In this response, they deny the claims made in the complaint and raise several legal reasons why the case should not continue. These reasons include arguments that the lawsuit is flawed or unfair in various ways. Margaret is asking the court to dismiss the case permanently and is also demanding that a jury trial be held to decide the matter.