This is a Motion in Limine filed by the defendant, Jonathan Link, seeking to exclude the State from introducing 404(B) evidence at trial. The motion argues that the evidence the State intends to introduce is speculative, prejudicial, and does not meet the admissibility requirements under Ohio law. The filing requests the court to bar such evidence or, alternatively, to reserve ruling and address objections as they arise during trial.
Filing Date
Wednesday, November 19, 2025
Client Summary
Jonathan Link, representing the defendant, has submitted a request to the court asking to keep certain evidence from being used during the trial. This evidence, known as 404(B) evidence, is information about past behavior that the State wants to include, but Jonathan argues that it is based on guesses, could unfairly influence the jury, and doesn’t follow the rules set by Ohio law. He is asking the court to prevent this evidence from being presented, or if needed, to decide how to handle any objections when they come up during the trial.